With analog you are constrained by chemistry. With digital you have more control, I suppose, over the final image. On the other hand, there is a certain look to analog and there are really endless creative possibilities with films, papers, toners, lith, alternative process and etc. I think a mix of analog and digital, however, is very exciting indeed and that is what I am exploring now as well as some traditional BW. Cliff

Stunning IQ. Makes you wonder whether we really have advanced that much. Stephen

Thanks Stephen. This was 120 roll film/Portra 400VC scanned at lab as I requested processing and basic proof scans on CD, no prints. The lab scan was 6.8 meg jpeg and I resized to 1500 pixels at max thus about 2.9 megs at 72ppi. Noritsu lab scanner. I made no Photoshop vibrance or saturation adjustments, just tiny crop from bottom. Camera and lens circa 1958. Cliff

Wonderful colour and textures to this image. What did you scan the negative on, as it has really scanned it well. Stephen

Linhof Technika 23 with CZ 100mm Planar 2.8. Kodak Portra 400. Handheld no adjustments. View large.